In TALONS Socials, we were assigned op ed articles to write, relating to Aboriginal issues. I perused through some of my classmates’ articles, and found many conflicting opinions, all of which I find equally valid and equally important.
Obviously we all have opinions of our own, and I found that as I read through my peers’ blog posts, many of which were about two things (funding and education), my opinion was becoming more and more refined. I agreed and disagreed with many points made within the blogosphere of our class, I watched as my own opinion rose out out of my opinions of the individual points made by my fellow students. And so… Here is my contribution of fodder to the discussion of Aboriginal issues:
I agree with Louise to disagree with Nick.
“There are government housing programs for you which exist nowhere else in the country and you (status-Indians) have access to the same education, healthcare (including paid healthcare premiums if you live in B.C. or Alberta), old age pensions, and social services as anyone else living in Canada.”
That makes sense. They are Canadian citizens.
The reason Aboriginal people receive services and programs that non-Native people do not is because they are clearly one of, if not most disadvantaged major demographic(s) in Canada. The Turtle Island Support Group Coalition for a Public Inquiry into Ipperwash, “an ad hoc group of community-based Indigenous Peoples and Canadian human rights organizations that share a common concern about the ongoing racial discrimination experienced by Indigenous Peoples in Canada,” filed a report to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination demonstrating loss of Native land and resources, disrespect for Indigenous People, racial discrimination, lack of consultation by the government regarding major issues, and loss of culture and language. Louise’s post is chock-full of evidence of many of these accusations. And though many people blame the Aboriginals for their current situation, as it is said, a country should be judged by how it treats its worst-off citizens. We are all humans, and even though some may work harder than others, and should therefore be rewarded as such, we are all fundamentally equal enough that the gap between the top and the bottom of the scale of affluence should be kept to a minimum. There are so many uncontrollable factors that life throws in, to make it difficult for many people to take advantage of their lives, and so everyone deserves to be at least on a similar playing field. The Aboriginal people are near or at the bottom of our society in the ways that they are regarded, and in their ability to contribute to society, due to their relative lack of credentials, as mentioned by Andrew:
For Aboriginals aged 15 to 24, 40 percent have not completed high school, or university. Compare that to only 20 percent of non-Aboriginals, leading to the conclusion that the funding imbalance is creating a huge gap between the Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals. Still worse, 27% of people aged 15 – 64 (the prime working age) do not even have a high school diploma, while only 12% of non-Aboriginals did not finish high school.
Since the majority of Aboriginal people experience living quality and education poorer than those of the average non-Aboriginal, it is our duty as a country to assist them in such a fashion that they can experience the life that the average non-Aboriginal experiences on a day to day basis.
The other suggestion that Nick made was to assimilate the Aboriginal people into Canada’s general population, to which Louise disagreed with:
“I’m not suggesting that the government completely cut off help to the First Nations, because most of them wouldn’t be able to make it without the government’s help. Rather, I think that the government should help assimilate First Nations into Canada’s general population as quickly as possible because not only is it an economic problem, but it is simply not fair that someone has more rights than I do simply because my ancestors wronged them hundreds of years ago.”
That’s what our first Prime Minister, Macdonald, said. He told everyone that his government would “do away with the tribal system and assimilate the Indian people in all respects with the inhabitant of the Dominion of Canada.” A lot of good that did.
Two words: Residential schooling. Don’t catch my drift? As classmate Kiko says:
Just thinking about having that taken away from me is incomprehensible, and yet that, and much more, was exactly what happened to Native people from 1876, when the Indian Act first was implemented, to around 1951, when the Indian Act was amended to lift bans on the Potlatch and other ceremonial traditions. Natives were stripped of their culture and identity, in an attempt by the Canadian government to assimilate them into European culture.
In 1884, an amendment was made to the Indian Act, making it against the law to participate in the Potlatch ceremony and to perform the Sun Dance; children were sent away from their parents to residential schools and were banned from speaking their language or performing any aspects of their culture, and were beaten and abused regularly; in 1895 yet another amendment was made to the Indian Act banning Indian festivals, dances, and other ceremonies, and many other acts and laws were implemented to try to end the Native culture.
How would YOU like to be stripped of your identity? Technically all non-Aboriginal people are immigrants, or descendants of. Our forefathers came to this country from France, China, Chile, Indonesia, and all over the world. For instance, my family hails from the People’s Republic of Korea, also known as South Korea. If we ever feel that we are losing grasp of our heritage, we may revive it by visiting our home country, where South Korean culture is alive and the heritage is preserved. The Aboriginal people have no such option. Canada IS their home country. Their roots are here. Assimilation into mainstream Canadian culture would be equivalent to cutting those roots off and making a campfire with them. Obviously that is no solution!
Iwon’t bore you with statistics, as almost all the blog posts of my fellow classmates paint a picture of bleak futures for many Aboriginal youth. For instance, Andrew tell us:
In every province except British Columbia, Aboriginals receive significantly less funding than non-Aboriginals, sometimes as much as $3,000 less. Only in British Columbia, do Aboriginals receive more funding, $10, 407 per student, than non-Aboriginals, $9, 157 per student.Many people stereotype Aboriginals as a smoker, alcoholic, and a drop-out . I do not think that you can change this stereotype by giving them less of an opportunity to learn, and be educated. Without the proper funding, Aboriginals can not get the education they need. Without the proper education, Aboriginals can not get to university. So, they will find a dead-end job with little chance of succeeding at life, setting a bad example for their kids. It is a vicious cycle, and one that few people can break out of. Aboriginals NEED the same amount of funding as is given to non-Aboriginals.
It is clear that there is something wrong with Aboriginal funding in our country. However, more is not always better. Andrew mentioned that in British Columbia, Aboriginals receive more funding for education than non-Aboriginals. But is that really visible in results? The stereotype of the drop-out Aboriginal still persists here in British Columbia. That makes me wonder exactly how efficient Aboriginal education funding is. Does the money really reach the schools, and the students? Or is it squandered on inefficient administrative costs, fees, and feeding the mouths of powerful chiefs? Jordan thinks so:
Article here.
“Only $5.4 Billion of all federal “Aboriginal” spending actually ever reaches First Nations.
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Department officials have confirmed that only about 82% of policy and program funds actually reach First Nations in the form of grants and contributions. Treasury Board estimates that 11% or $600 million per year is spent on INAC departmental overhead.
It is estimated that only about 53% of “aboriginal issues” funding from other federal departments actually reaches First Nations. This issue requires further study.
INAC’s budget represents only approximately 0.004% of Canada’s Gross Domestic Product. Affordability to address First Nations’ urgent needs is not under question. In the last Budget, the federal government applied the $13.2 billion surplus to the debt, and this surplus continues to grow. Meanwhile, it invested $17 billion in military spending …”
Underfunding is a factor in this equation, but when people chant for increased funding to the Aboriginals, I don’t think they realize that the process is just as big of an issue.
It is clear that Aboriginal funding has been a huge issue for a very long time, and I have no objection to supporting the needy members of the Aboriginal community. However, I do have an objection to taxpayers’ money being wasted. Throwing money at problems will not always solve them. The government needs to start being more efficient about how they fund the Aboriginals. It’s like shooting blindly in the dark. I would imagine that if the government bothered to make the effort to find a light switch and take aim, they would hit the target. The target of creating a better life for Aboriginal youth in Canada.